Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mojave

“Um, Mr Inviso owns weimaraners.
Um, he was opposing pit restrictions”

Um, no, I was opposing someone’s little vigilante fantasy of what they want to be pit restrictions, to the point of being able to shoot other peoples’ dogs on sight. Someone wants a pretty well unrestricted hunting license for dogs that aren’t theirs, to be able to shoot what THEY THINK, WITHOUT ANY TRAINING, AND WITH PROBABLY DARN LITTLE KNOWLEDGE, is a pit. Someone, like you, who judges based on very little info, (like your dumb crack about gang-banger mentality) and wants to be judge, jury, and executioner. Ever heard of a little thing called “due process”? It’s supposed to be required before you deprive people of life, liberty, or property. That means (in this case)you have someone who knows what they are doing, decide what is and isn’t a pit, THEN anything that is legally required is done properly, instead of firing upon, let’s say, a dog in a backyard that ISN’T YOURS.


273 posted on 11/23/2008 10:32:40 AM PST by Mr Inviso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Inviso
Ever heard of a little thing called “due process”?

Yes. That's where a pit bull owner has to go to the police instead of shooting people.

279 posted on 11/23/2008 10:59:41 AM PST by Mojave (http://laissez-fairerepublic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson