Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LongIslandConservative
Justice Thomas saw enough merit in the case to schedule a closed door conference. If not he would have dismissed it outright.

Just who will be a part of this conference???

44 posted on 11/19/2008 1:38:06 PM PST by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Chip

All the other Justices. I think 4 in total have to agree.


46 posted on 11/19/2008 1:40:57 PM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Chip

From post # 10

A cert petition is voted on at a session of the Court called a conference. A conference is a private meeting of the nine Justices by themselves; the public is not permitted to attend, and neither are the Justices’ law clerks. If four Justices vote to grant the petition, then the case proceeds to the briefing stage; otherwise, the case ends. Except in death penalty cases and other cases in which the Court orders briefing from the respondent, the respondent may, but is not required to, file a response to the cert petition.

Thomas needs to convince 3 other Justices to satisfy the Rule of 4 to get a full hearing scheduled.
If, and when that happens there should be trememdous MSM coverage, which various Constitutional scholars and historians being interviewed.
If would be a truly historic hearing that has never been argued in front of SCOTUS before.


47 posted on 11/19/2008 1:43:14 PM PST by LongIslandConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson