I hadn’t made the legitimate link you did on the “kill and eat” thing (i.e., that those who support abortion really shouldn’t mind eating human fetuses). After all, it isn’t like they ACTUALLY ARE human, just because they’re HUMAN fetuses, right?
We eat meat from animals all the time, and all these fetuses from all these 55 million abortions is just meat going to waste. How about NOT!!!
Take a moment and consider the taxonomic system by which every living thing is rigorously categorized and classified. By that system a human embryo is of the kingdom Anamalia, of the phylum Chordata, of the class Mammalia, of the order Primate, of the family Pongidae, of the genus Homo, and of the species Sapiens - same as any other human being. Put even more simply, that embryo is a human by virtue of its parents, and a being by the fact that it is a living thing: it is a human being.
I get so morally sick of the people who say they want to keep abortion safe, legal, and rare. As if there is a fundamental right that should be rare (free speech perhaps? Liberals certainly want to keep that rare by means of their fascist ‘Fairness Doctrine’). If something is a right, we should want MORE of it, not less. It is blatant hypocrisy so depraved people can feel, well, somehow like they’re less depraved than they actually are.
You are saying that if fetuses are just tissue, then (to be consistent) with millions starving, would would they refuse to support using the millions of aborted fetuses for food?
You might ask the Sen. Barbara Boxers of this country this question.
In fact, perhaps prohibitions on cannibalism (of conservative perhaps) to feed the poor can be abrogated as violation of the first amendment, if such a law was influenced by religious convictions.
(Psa 2:1-3) “Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.”