Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: redrunner

I agree that many of the above phrases, but “you need to” tops the irritant list for me. It drives me nuts when, instead of “have to”, “must”, “should”, “ought”, or whatever it is they really mean, people use the imprecise and bossy-sounding “need to” in a misguided attempt to give more weight and authority to their words. As in, “You need to come with me, Sir”. Why not just say “Please come with me, Sir.”? Not only more courteous and professional-sounding, but it has the incidental advantage of being precisely what is meant.

See now, you shouldn’t have got me going...


25 posted on 11/07/2008 1:07:09 PM PST by CaliGirlGodHelpMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CaliGirlGodHelpMe
I agree that many of the above phrases, but “you need to” tops the irritant list for me.

I heartily agree with you. I believe the use of "need to" in this manner must have arisen relatively recently. At least, I first noticed it during a brief return to the States in the 1990s. (Living abroad makes one more sensitive to changes in the language.)

I find it irritating because it represents a phony kind of politeness. I'd much rather have someone bark "You must..." or "It is prohibited..." or "I order you..." at me in an authoritative voice than whine "Uh, sir: You NEED TO..." and pretend that it is a request.

Regards,

77 posted on 11/07/2008 2:05:01 PM PST by alexander_busek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson