Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Notary Sojac
If I have a choice between buying a $35 disc I can only watch in one room of my house, versus a $15 disc I can watch in six different places, plus my PC, plus rip it to my Palm TX, it will be, and has been, an easy decision.

Seriously. What Sony should have done is make DVD's that would be read like a DVD on a DVD player, but read like a Blu-Ray disc on a Blu-Ray player. They had the technology years ago, but never did anything with it. Instead companies went with dumb double-sided discs or packaged a DVD with a Blu-Ray disc.

If Sony had just sold all their DVD's with a Blu-Ray layer for a couple of years, then they could just tell customers that they can take advantage of the movies they already own when selling the Blu-Ray players.

52 posted on 10/29/2008 1:33:12 PM PDT by dan1123 (If you want to find a person's true religion, ask them what makes them a "good person".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: dan1123

“Seriously. What Sony should have done is make DVD’s that would be read like a DVD on a DVD player, but read like a Blu-Ray disc on a Blu-Ray player. They had the technology years ago, but never did anything with it. Instead companies went with dumb double-sided discs or packaged a DVD with a Blu-Ray disc.”

BD has a different structure than DVD. You cannot combine BD and DVD. HD DVD had the option of putting DVD and HD layers on the same side of the disc but the option was not really utilized by the studios.


69 posted on 10/29/2008 4:58:49 PM PDT by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson