I gather the answer to all 3 avoided questions was
NO
NO
AND
NO.
You have little more than fractional hints about what I truly think on any handful of a long list of specifics in this large field.
I doubt you have studied it since 1962. Are you even that old?
I doubt you’ve had a close relative who worked around it.
I doubt you’ve met and talked at length with as many internationally famous researchers on 2 continents and from 3 continents as I have.
If anyone’s lack of critical thinking skills and gullibility are extra overblown features of their approach to this field, it would appear that both are true in your case.
We shall see which of my assertions bears out in due course. I have no apologies to make at this time.
And Stanton Friedman is top flight.
My only concern about him is that the last time or two I’ve met him and listened to him lecture . . . he’s begun to sound like a globalist shill in behalf of a world government to deal with the UFO/ET stuff. Nothing too dramatic but enough for someone well read and paying attention to notice it very clearly.
While I predicted such 3-4 decades ago, it saddens me to see him come down on that side even though I’ve long suspected it.
ATS has a motto
DENY IGNORANCE
Sounds like you could profit from a lot of time there.
I “avoided” the questions because I have the capability to give Friedman nothing more than a passing glance.
And as has been stated elsewhere, you can pretend to be anything on the internet. Let’s see your bona fides, and some names of those you “know”.
Oh, silly me. You have friends in such high places, and if you told me, then you’d have to kill me, right?