Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: decimon

I stopped using Kodachrome in the early 80s when the new generation of Fujichrome hit the market. Fujichrome 50 had the same grain and sharpness as Kodachrome 25, much better colour rendition (especially fleshtones), cost less and could be processed anywhere.


7 posted on 09/22/2008 3:36:51 AM PDT by Squawk 8888 (TSA and DHS are jobs programs for people who are not smart enough to flip burgers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Squawk 8888
I stopped using Kodachrome in the early 80s when the new generation of Fujichrome hit the market.

Turncoat! Quisling!

8 posted on 09/22/2008 3:48:09 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Squawk 8888
I love Fujichrome, but there really is no comparison between the E6 films and the Kodachrome process. The Fujifilm give much more realistic and accurate colors, but Kodachrome has a feel to it that has never really been reproduced except by Agfa, but Agfa sharpness sucked.

I Think what I will miss most is some of the great Black and White films which digital doesn't seem to be able to come close to. PanX developed using direct positive to produce Black and White transparencies is absolutely beautiful. If you have never tried it, you should before it's gone. Also, I forget the film name right now, but there is a scientific B/W film that you can use a special low contrast developer for that produces sharp 4’x6’ B/W prints with almost no grain at 12 ASA.

I will miss film so much. Kodachrome, Fujichome, PanX, CibaChrome, Tri-X, VPS, etc...

17 posted on 09/22/2008 5:08:10 AM PDT by Woodman ("One of the most striking differences between a cat and a lie is that a cat has only nine lives." PW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson