“it’s the baby’s body INSIDE of your body. It has a different blood type and different DNA and it’s own finger and toes. As I understand it, the pro-lifers say you can do anything you want with your OWN body, but they object to you destroying the body of your unborn child. I personally believe that a fetus”...
Baby’s body - blood type/DNA - fingers and toes - unborn child -
this sounds like a human being, a person, doesn’t it? your words, not mine - and yet, you end by calling him/her a “fetus” (good clinical term, right?)
“this sounds like a human being, a person, doesn’t it? your words, not mine - and yet, you end by calling him/her a “fetus” (good clinical term, right?)”
Ummmmmmm You do know the entire text was NOT from me, but from someone on the DU? I was just posting what the person wrote. She was upset that her DU was spreading the lie about Palins baby.
And if the baby is not a separate entity, then there is no such thing as rape. Because a man might be convicted of rape on the basis of his SEPARATE DNA INSIDE HER BODY. If separate DNA inside a woman's body is still counted as that woman, then that rape never happened. That was just her own DNA, and she was just doing what she chose to do with her own body, lying on the sidewalk being penetrated by a stranger with a gun to her head. No big deal.