[Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus]

The courts didn't make a scientific determination. They caught the Discovery Institute lying about the fact that they used the same definition for ID as they did for creationism in a textbook. Liars for God. What a concept!.

Again, I think you've missed the point, so let me simplify it for you. The "courts" have no credibility to determine what is "science", regardless of the name it goes under.

[Soliton]

Proof that ID is creationism in disguise:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-tk7MkHKtI

The Discovery Institute knowingly lied. They adopted ID to get areound the SCOTUS ruling. The proof is at the link above. You have probably already seen it, but since it contradicts your crusade, you just ignore the truth.

[steve-b]

The "courts" have no credibility to determine what is "science"

According to this absurd assertion, a science teacher is free to instruct the class that voting Republican causes cancer, and there would be no legal avenue to prevent it (as the court could not find that the assertion was not a scientific teaching, and thus would have no possible basis for concluding that it was in any way inappropriate to include in a science class).