Thanks for the derision however.
I am not big into derision, but some of the atheists are really rude to the creationists. I was a little hard on you, but I do not delight in being mean and insolent. I thought you might think about that the next time you feel like being rude to "crevos". We have feelings to. I appologize if I was too assertive, seasoned with cynicism.
BUT, my questions stand, and are as valid, as if I have been nice.
By the way, I did paruse your other reference link "The RNA World". As an engineer you would not build a building with the laxaty of science discussed in that report. I quote..."RNA World referred to an Hyopthetical stage in the origin of life on earth". He goes on to say that he discovered that in primitive systems RNA could catalyze phosphodiesterase bonds. He says other RNA's have been found to cleave peptidyl transferase center of bacterial 50S ribosomal subunits containing RNA without protein. He says in-vitro RNA can have many catalytic functions.
Then he says, "On further reflection many doubts have been raised about whether or not the original genetic/catalytic material could have been RNA as we we know today.
The assumptions made in this paper is so far beyond anything I was allowed in my days in graduate school that it boggles my mind that it would even be published.
The best I can say for this article is they need to keep looking underneath the rocks, because they have nothing, NOTHING, here.
I will review your other 'scientific' link, just to be fair.