Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nmh
Ok, as someone who is tagged with evangelical and I am not self tagged that way.....I did not support MR because he is a liberal.

Now I am constantly amazed and amused that some if not most ldsers are to thick to get it - MR is a liberal, MR is a liberal, MR is a liberal and that is why I do not support him.

31 posted on 07/15/2008 12:56:58 PM PDT by svcw (There is no plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: svcw

“Ok, as someone who is tagged with evangelical and I am not self tagged that way.....I did not support MR because he is a liberal.
Now I am constantly amazed and amused that some if not most ldsers are to thick to get it - MR is a liberal, MR is a liberal, MR is a liberal and that is why I do not support him.”

With this childish chant:

” ... MR is a liberal, MR is a liberal, MR is a liberal ... I know I’m not a liberal is neither is Mitt. McPain is. Obama is. Perhaps that is another reason you are attracted to one of the two? Don’t tell me, Mike, the shyster was your man. He’s WORSE than Obama when it comes to liberalism.


34 posted on 07/15/2008 1:59:36 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson