This undated handout image shows an evolutionary tree with the gradual anatomical changes in the evolution of flatfishes resulting in the origin of their extraordinary, modern body plan. Some odd-looking fish fossils discovered in the bowels of several European museums may help solve a lingering question about evolutionary theory, U.S. researchers said on July 9, 2008. (M. Friedman/The Field Museum/Handout./Reuters)
Oh yeah...that explains Everything.
Why do evolutionists always post drawings to illustrate their theory? Why not real-life examples?
I would reply but it would serve no porpoise.
“... this arrangement gives them the use of two watchful eyes.”
Flat lot of gig it does ‘em too...
It's obvious. The fish evolved to get its eyes out of the museum dirt. While it was doing so, it also evolved lungs so it could breath the air in the drawer.
It could also be that the fish swam in a government school and its viewpoint became biased.
Seriously, I wonder if the scientist was able to disprove the possibility that the fish were killed and fossilized during the stage of their life cycle when the eye had only moved partway around.
Unless you are a degreed biologist, it is out of plaice for you to to even dab at this subject. You ought turbot out and let the evolutionists do all the talking. Hold your tonguefish.
To get some perspective, I just went back and read the first chapter of Genesis. Very simple and straightforward. But I suspect that if the same level of scutiny we applied to this account of creation as I see given to the theory of evolution, it would appear to be no more credible than a fairy tale.