Welllllllllllllllll AlexW . . . enjoy the illusion that a TYPE II ERROR bites less deadly than a TYPE I error does.
In terms of the notion that some craft appear to be organisms . . . some may be. Some have hypothesized that they are ‘other dimensional’ or ‘spiritual.’ Quite plausible.
However, it doesn’t work for me for all of them. My relative worked around tangible craft that were technology.
Also, there are more than 3,000 verified tangible trace etc. sites wherein the sites visited by; landed on; etc. by UFO’s left tangible scientifically verifiable impacts on the environment in more than 3,000 studied cases. The presentation on that at the Aztec Conference in March was quite convincing and well done.
Of course, until one lands in some folks’ laps, they won’t believe anything unusual is going on.
Scientism and a bastardized version at that, seems to be their religion.
“Also, there are more than 3,000 verified tangible trace etc. sites wherein the sites visited by; landed on; etc”
I know, I know..(Linda Mugu How are you), is on the seen of all.
So many crop circles to study. And whats his name Houghland
knows all about men on Mars and glass houses on the moon.
SHOW ME THE BEEF.
By the waqy...Whats a tangible trace? A space alian fart?