For the record, here’s a few snips of the evil filth you’ve been slinging here in just the last couple of weeks. Go back further and it’s easy to find worse, you represent your ilk from DU well:
Sorry, I forgot how nasty some Christians can be in response to perceived threats to their dogma.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2037444/posts?page=344#344
As is usual for apologists you are really reaching to explain away problems in the Bible.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2037444/posts?page=229#229
What you’re doing to the Bible is the equivalent of looking at a cloud and seeing a fluffy bunny. It is itself born suspect.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2037444/posts?page=412#412
The religious often think they’re superior and can apply their beliefs to all others. Both are annoying to me because of their agenda to make others believe or act as they do, by force of logic, law, or violence.
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:antirepublicrat/index?tab=comments;brevity=full;options=no-change
This is the champion of Intelligent Design, a bunch of liars.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2037444/posts?page=181#181
If you actually have a functioning brain, you realize the Bible is not inerrant and some reason such as rounding or lack of knowledge caused the authors to write 10 and 30.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2037444/posts?page=324#324
It reminds me of the old Carlin skit, thank God for every touchdown, but you never hear “Jesus made me fumble on the line of scrimmage.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2033923/posts?page=13#13
Sorry, I forgot how nasty some Christians can be in response to perceived threats to their dogma.
In response to an unprovoked personal attack by a Christian who I hadn't even posted to on that thread. The originating post even stated that science should not be taught as "truth," IOW, it shouldn't be competing with religious claims to truth.
As is usual for apologists you are really reaching to explain away problems in the Bible.
To someone who was making ridiculous claims as to why a pool had a circumference of 30 cubits and a diameter of 10 cubits, making pi 3. The specific claim referenced was "Whose arm was used for the cubit?" which has no relation to the ratio of pi, and that is reaching. In that very same post I myself explained away the pi problem of the Bible rationally, better than the apologist in question did.
What you’re doing to the Bible is the equivalent of looking at a cloud and seeing a fluffy bunny. It is itself born suspect.
In response to someone who is into Bible code, which I believe is also rejected by most Christians and Jews.
The religious often think they’re superior and can apply their beliefs to all others. Both are annoying to me because of their agenda to make others believe or act as they do, by force of logic, law, or violence.
Wonderful, a completely out of context quote. It was in response to a Christian who complimented me for being honest. The part just preceding that you left out on purpose in order to distort my post was that I apply this equally to religion-haters such as Hitchens who want to force their non-belief on others.
This is the champion of Intelligent Design, a bunch of liars.
Written immediately after I gave a concrete example of a Discovery Institute lie.
If you actually have a functioning brain, you realize the Bible is not inerrant and some reason such as rounding or lack of knowledge caused the authors to write 10 and 30.
Yeah, that was a little harsh, written after I was subjected to some abuse by a Christian. But I was backed by the evidence.
It reminds me of the old Carlin skit, thank God for every touchdown, but you never hear “Jesus made me fumble on the line of scrimmage.”
Very true. When do people ever attribute bad things that happen to them to God?
Well, there we go. You love to lose context in order to lie.