Concerning the classification of H. ergaster experts agree that it is intermediate and a transitional.
Creationists disagree for religious reasons. For religious reasons they can't abide by transitionals--and so they make up all manner of excuses to ignore the data.
I'll listen to the scientists.
I think I said it best on another thread, so I’ll repeat it here. The part about going haywire doesn’t apply to you, as you haven’t, and you’re being civil, but the part about denial does. I presented a logical point and instead of presenting an argument or accepting it, you’re launching into a tirade about creationists not having logic (interesting, when you’re the one who can’t answer the logical point) and that you’ll listen to scientists (discounting, of course, all scientists who disagree), proving that Darwinism is indeed a very brainwashing faith (typical Darwinian we’re right even when shown to be wrong, we have “faith” in our scientists - I know those aren’t the words you’d choose to describe your philosophy, but you’ve shown them to be true).
Anyway, here’s what I wrote with regard to the religion of Darwinism and many of the points have just been shown to be true by your reaction:
The adherents to evolutionism include many militants who definitely accept Darwinism by faith and go haywire like a Mooney being decultified when challenged by valid counterarguments.
That said, I wouldn’t call it scientism, as in truth, their religion is the opposite of real science. They have a closed minded and one sided dogmatic allegiance to a pseudo science that refuses to allow them to consider any alternatives. When they lose on science they take to personally maligning or otherwise attacking their opponets. I’d specify that their religions are Darwinism, Algorism, Fakegaygeneism, etc., but not sciencism, because they are against science (maybe anti-logism).