[Coyoteman]

The “ergaster” specimen still do not possess transitional traits, features of both homo and austral, the question is only what to make of the (primarily) skull shape.

You are wrong. You have blinded yourself so thoroughly that you will not see anything beyond the narrow framework you have created for yourself.

The experts who have actually studied ergaster have established a number of traits which are transitional. Creationist authors have also disagreed on where to place ergaster, whether ape or human, for the same reason.

Even creationists can see the intermediate nature of the species, but you refuse to. I think that says more about you than ergaster.

[Yomin Postelnik]

So when you can’t answer any questions of substance you make it personal instead?

You’ve said nothing in your last post other than ad hominem insinuations. I dub thee “Evolutionist.”

Thank you for confirming the validity of the points I raised (but not answering them).