No you did not.
Had you read what I wrote, you would have realized that I addressed the unitive aspect of marriage as well as the procreative - yet you characterize my posts as only looking at the procreative and not the unitive.
The issue in question here is not the man's infertility or fertility - it is his impotence.
So what? Geesh and you think today's society in the west is screwed up yet you can not it seems understand why? I want you to have sex says the church or else! Good grief!
Many secure and loving marriages are absent such act and flourish and are GOD centered. So tell me this then how is the Bishop even gonna tell if the man is cured? Look upon him during sex to have a look see? Paraplegia doesn't necessarilly mean impotence nor does quadriplegia.
This is insanity and misapplication of laws at their very worst. BTW his seed unless he was medically castrated {not the same thing as impotent} is still there and can be extracted.