Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream
Indeed some of the most rapid evolution we see is the LOSS of features, such as eyeless cave fish.

Actually, that's all we see.

Do try to keep up with at least the very basics of a theory you wish to critique.

I'm trying, but it's difficult since the basics keep changing.
58 posted on 05/28/2008 12:17:15 PM PDT by Sopater (A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left. ~ Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Sopater
The basics have not changed, our understanding of them has been refined. It is a really simple concept throughout, but the details can get kind of tricky if you are ignorant of the Scientific method.

Sorry, but loss of structures in evolution (which you first attempt to deny was evolution because it wasn't advancement) is just one type of evolution.

At one time there were no mammals with hooves or wings. Where do you think they came from (or do you think they were there from the beginning?)?

At one time there was neither nylon to digest or a bacteria that could digest nylon. Where do you think nylon digesting bacteria came from?

At one time there were no placental mammals. Where did they come from and why are non-placental mammals limited to Australia and the opossum?

61 posted on 05/28/2008 12:35:01 PM PDT by allmendream (Life begins at the moment of contraception. ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson