To: Sopater
If it isn't naturalistic it simply isn't Science, seeings as how the poster was looking for a “competing scientific explanation” then supernatural mumbo jumbo is excluded.
Do you think Science can measure God? Do you think Science can get God to act reproducibly in the laboratory? If yes to either or both then God isn't much of a god. If no, then God will never be part of Science. Why is faith not enough?
47 posted on
05/28/2008 10:22:21 AM PDT by
allmendream
(Life begins at the moment of contraception. ;))
To: allmendream
Do you think Science can measure God? Do you think Science can get God to act reproducibly in the laboratory? If yes to either or both then God isn't much of a god. If no, then God will never be part of Science. Why is faith not enough?
Granted. Do you think Science can measure the ancient past? Do you think that you can get millions of years to act reproducibly in the laboratory? If the answer to either or both of these is no, then the ToE isn't part of science either. Faith will have to be enough.
51 posted on
05/28/2008 11:01:58 AM PDT by
Sopater
(A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left. ~ Ecclesiastes 10:2)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson