Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: taxcontrol

I see your point with it being a cost efficiency issue.... However, I noticed that they’re claiming that it produces 70 watts from a concentrated 230 watts.

That’s 30.4% efficiency, a remarkably high efficiency for solar cells. Are these Gallium-Arsenide cells? Those are the only ones I’ve ever seen break 30%. But they’re danged expensive, so minimizing the amount used would be critical.

The other thing that I don’t remember a thing about that I wonder with this is what the effect of temperature on efficiency is on a typical array. The best of both worlds would be if concentrating the sun reduced the amount of cells you needed, and the cells used would increase in efficiency at a higher operating temperature.... You might need to cool them, still, but like a car engine, which runs best at a careful balance well above ambient temps....


28 posted on 05/16/2008 12:58:08 PM PDT by eraser2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: eraser2005
Yes, cells that can operate at high temps would be even a better solution. Unfortunately, almost all of that research, or at least as far as I know, has stopped. The focus of late is to create broad spectrum cells that can use more of the light by creating multi-layer cells, each that operate at a given light frequency.
29 posted on 05/16/2008 9:16:00 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson