I haven’t gotten my mind around the difference, if any, of flooding the world with dollars and flooding the U.S. with dollars. I mean, the dollars would still exist one way or the other, right? What difference does it make with regard to inflation if I spend my hard-earned money on Heineken over Budweiser?
So you support the Mumbler/Bumbler's Aid to Africa program?
You cannot understand that spending the tiny amount on a wasteful program vs. a program that keeps food cheap, will cost taxpayers?
That $30 billion still comes out of the taxpayer's pocket.
What's that fancy Latin term:
Qui bono?