He's not in the room?? What a surprise? /sarc How do even remotely think that I supposed he was there after I criticised you for asserting that you had "posted the entire exchange" by pointing out that "What you posted was what Meyer stated that a friend of his stated that Shapiro stated."? I read the entire context of that renamed link. I know that you are citing the eeeeviiiil Discovery intstitute and the eeeeviiiill Stephen Meyer. The irony is delicious.
What is clear from the general writings and interviews of Shapiro is that he always distances himself from any implication that his conjectures require supernatural intervention.
You are doing what you accused me of doing, "making things up". This brings up another delicious irony, "Unfortunately, the answer to both questions is yes.", Shapiro stated that. You harp on the second question that has a yes answer. What was the first question which is answered yes?
Why are you surprised that I would quote from (with links to) hostile sources? It’s pretty obvious that the Discovery Institute was pretty unhappy with Shapiro’s review of Behe, and it’s pretty obvious that cdesign proponentsists are surprised and disappointed that someone who calls himself a critic of neo-Darwinism would not support them.
Shapiro works within naturalism and denies any role for the supernatural. Live with it.