If their story was internally consistent it would hold more weight. For instance, if Adam and Eve were the first humans, who did their children mate with?
[[If their story was internally consistent it would hold more weight. For instance, if Adam and Eve were the first humans, who did their children mate with?]]
Their genetically pure sisters and brothers- so on and so forth= next objection?
Any literal reading of Genesis would demonstrate that the Adam and Eve were NOT the first or the only humans created in the beginning of this flesh age. Now why is it that the evolutionists refuse to accept what Genesis literally says??? Is it a thing of 'knowledge' passed down through the ages??