That's evasive and dishonest. If you were teaching Sunday School or participating in a church sponsored discussion of doctrine, you would criticise other church's doctrines.
These discussions always boil down to naturalism vs supernaturalism, natural history vs intervention.
Shapiro disavows the need for supernatural explanations.
No it is not. This is not a church sponsored discussion of doctrine and I am not teaching Sunday school. Shapiro does not disavow the need for supernatural explanations, he addresses what he addresses. I have supported the contention that DNA is like a computer program. You have not supported your viewpoint. Now you attempt red herring by having me attack someone or something outside of the scope of the point we have been discussing. I won't go for it. At this juncture it is apparent that the DNA molecule is code. That is a step in the direction of Intelligent design.
These discussions always boil down to naturalism vs supernaturalism, natural history vs intervention.
That is what Shapiro stated in "A Third Way",(because the debate about evolution continues to assume the quality of an abstract and philosophical "dialogue of the deaf" between Creationists and Darwinists.) and you are addressing it in exactly the way Shapiro stated you typically do.
Instead, they assume a defensive posture of outraged orthodoxy and assert an unassailable claim to truth, which only serves to validate the Creationists' criticism that Darwinism has become more of a faith than a science.