Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: From many - one.; CottShop

"I have posted to others previously that I will not participate in obfuscatory arguments.

I will, when I feel like it, post references to information. What you do with it is not my problem."


Either swim, or stay out of the pool.

Otherwise, you have no right to complain when someone calls you on your duck-n-run technique or flames your monologue.
804 posted on 04/07/2008 1:29:20 PM PDT by Fichori (Truth is non-negotiable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 800 | View Replies ]


To: Fichori

Yup- he can post obfuscatory based assumptions- try to present them as indisputable facts, then tucks tail and runs when it’s pointed out that the links and subjects he posts are nothign but assumption driven guesses abotu past events and current ‘measurements’. Algorithms have serious flaws, and MUST rely on assumptions and filler arguments to support them- filler arguments that lack any scientific evidences to support I might add- so they’re even weaker arguemtns based on yet more assumptions and imaginary scenarios than they first appear. But yet we’re the ones being ‘obfuscatory’ lol


806 posted on 04/07/2008 2:06:12 PM PDT by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 804 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson