[[When a retrovirus-like element inserts in a new genomic location, it carries with it a defined set of regulatory signals that can affect the reading of nearby DNA sequences in very particular ways. This is an example of non-randomness.]]
How is that ‘non random’? It was a random insertion- The fact that a species can cope and compensate due to instructiosn already present that allow such cpoing after invasion in no way means the insertion wasn’t random
[[These phenomena show us that cells are capable of altering their genomes in non-random but not rigidly specified or pre-determined ways.]]
Oh really? And htey’ve determiend that they aren’t predetermined how? they’ve determined that isntructions don’t have parameters that include the ability to adjust to foriegn invaders how? And, “Cells cells are capable of altering their genomes”? If this were true, it indicates a thinking p[rocess- and as well indicates design. Cells have their genomes altered, they don’t somehow consciously make a descision to alter hteir genome on their own.
Masciarelli
is correct- the info IS frontloaded and awaiting catylysts to kickstart the designed features or changes that fall fully within species specific parameters.
If you are attacking Shapiro, you will have to address your questions to AndrewC. He is the Shapario man.