[From many - one.]

I said I wasn’t going to get into obfuscatory arguments.

If you choose to consider any sequence of base pairs in any arrangement as the same “data”, you may do so.

Considering the DNA based relationship trees used in modern phylogenetics, and ignoring the value judgements (”broken” copy mechanism) the answers to your questions are clearly in the res ipsa loquitur category.

Since doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result does not meet my definition of reasonable behavior, I will not respond to more questions. On occasion I will provide information. Since the scientist expulsion/exodus there are too few lurkers to post for and I have not got Coyoteman’s patience.

Courtesy ping to Coyoteman.

[CottShop]

[[Considering the DNA based relationship trees used in modern phylogenetics,]

Which coincidently doesn’t show common descent unless you fill in gaping holes with imaginary scenarios that violate nature, but rather shows discontinuity.

[Fichori]

"I said I wasn’t going to get into obfuscatory arguments.

If you choose to consider any sequence of base pairs in any arrangement as the same “data”, you may do so.

Considering the DNA based relationship trees used in modern phylogenetics, and ignoring the value judgements (”broken” copy mechanism) the answers to your questions are clearly in the res ipsa loquitur category.

Since doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result does not meet my definition of reasonable behavior, I will not respond to more questions. On occasion I will provide information. Since the scientist expulsion/exodus there are too few lurkers to post for and I have not got Coyoteman’s patience.

Courtesy ping to Coyoteman."

My experince has shown me that when someone does not want to debate their best evidence, it is simply because they know it will not withstand the scrutiny of debate.


If you do not wish to debate Evolutionary conjecture, I respect that decision.

But if your not going to debate a subject, please refrain from claiming there to be 'evidence' and then refusing to discuss the afore mentioned 'evidence'.

thanks.