[[It would be better to say that particles-to-people evolution is an unsubstantiated hypothesis or conjecture.
]]
Even without havign read that before abotu theory and conjecture, I’ve always felt that and written it as such because that is precisely what it is- an unsubstantiated, unproven, untested conjecture using a great deal of nothign more than assumptions as it’s foundational arguing points. besides- it flies in the face of natural laws and biological laws- something theories simply don’t do (or at hte least shouldn’t do)
As you know, I have been getting a lot of grief about the common v. scientific use of the word ‘theory’.
When I found something that would not only validate what was being posted concerning ‘theories’, but would also refute Evolution at the same time, I just couldn’t help myself.
I’ll probably get flamed again for saying this, but AIG has a lot of useful information.