To: Coyoteman
From post
564:"Most scientists have a hard time accepting ID because it is religion masquerading as pseudo-science hoping to be mistaken for junk science."
I then asked:
"Why would ID hope to be mistaken for junk science?"
That was a sincere question.
Your statement appeared to have a typo and I was just asking you to clarify what you meant.
586 posted on
04/04/2008 5:35:34 PM PDT by
Fichori
(Truth is non-negotiable.)
To: Fichori
That was a sincere question.
Your statement appeared to have a typo and I was just asking you to clarify what you meant. No problem (you can keep the rest of my reply for a later date). ; - )
588 posted on
04/04/2008 5:43:30 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson