[AndrewC]

Nevertheless, even if the information first appeared in 2002, Batten has had six years to correct his original statement or update it with another addendum. The fact that he hasn't suggests to me that presenting all the evidence is not high on his list of priorities.

No, it would not have a high priority since the data might be suspect.

I posted those two images of the "same" fossil for a reason. They do not contain the same fossil pieces. Look at the two "hips" on both images. Count the rib pieces. Count the tail vertebra, etc.

[Ha Ha Thats Very Logical]

I posted those two images of the "same" fossil for a reason. They do not contain the same fossil pieces.

Where are those two images from, and who said they were supposed to contain the same pieces?