[[Answers in Genesis repeats the blue-green algae lie]]
“Clearly, they intended to “deceive or give a wrong impression” regarding what Dr Schopf said. They lied, and an acknowledgement and correction should be forthcoming posthaste.”
Answer to that claim from AIG: “I know we are fallible, being human. But I think you know better than to think that we would deliberately lie ... We do not engage in “fabrications”, but if there is something in our publications that is in (inadvertent) error, a correction will be forthcoming in due course”
It’s nice that you and that site you listed both can escape the real world and delve into hte minds and see the intentions of of the poster at AIG and determine with absolute certainty their real intentions- you’ve missed your calling- you should call the psychic hotline and tell them you and hte site you listed can read minds and determine absolutes and intentions-
From your second link Serfati states “For example, since the pelvic girdle is not preserved, there is no direct evidence in Ambulocetus for a connection between the hind limbs and the axial skeleton. This hinders interpretations of locomotion in this animal, since many of the muscles that support and move the hindlimb originate on the pelvis”
And the site you list claims he ‘lied’ when Serfati’s old article predated more complete finds. It amazes me how quickly folks liek you glom onto mere opinion and speculation and hold it up as absolute truth- the article even mentioned that Serfati might not have been aware of the later finds, but yet the site STILL called him a liar- this is a FALSE accusation dread- yet you hold it up as though this one article refutes everythign AIG has written scientifically, based on nothing but your owen bias and predjudices.
Would you like me to start posting the BLATANT LIES by sites such as talk-origins, Panda’s thumb, and others? Because I guaruntee you the few gaffs presented by sites liek AIG do NOT rise to the level of deceit and dishonesty of the sites like Talkorigins
so let me get this straight- you’re ‘refuting’ all the science on AIG based on rediculous petty accusations and opinions by other sites? Swell- I asked you to show all the science on their sites was, as you say, “shi+”, but you show me excamples where mistakes were made, or knowledge abotu LATER finds was unknown, and you claim that these entirely acceptable and expectable falible gaffs somewhow dismantle all the science that has ever been presented on AIG and other Christian sites? Lol- if thaT’s the best you can do to show the site is nothign but “shi+” as you claim- then you fail to show anythiogn of the sort I’m afraid. Evidently, in your mind- sites that oppose your belief about Macroevolution aren’t afforded the right ot make mistakes or miss information, (yet somehow, you give much liberty to sites that support your belief in regards to being factually incorrect and yes, even outright lying)
Head on over to Trueorigins.org to find out the full extent of outright lies posted on ‘science’ sites liek talkorigins- it aint pretty- yet you’ll fully excuse sites liek talkorigins while jumping on sites liek AIG for making mistakes? Groovey- nope- no bais going on here
Sure. It would be educational, not to mention entertaining.
But the thing about the Web is that you can go back and correct errors when you find out about them. Sarfati has had ample opportunity to correct his out-of-date statement (I'm being charitable here), and in fact has gone in and added a reference to an addendum on another page written in 2002. But for some reason he hasn't bothered to change the text of what he originally wrote to reflect what he should now know. The original material is still there, uncorrected, and it's still being quoted on other creationist sites as fact. How dishonest do you have to be before "liar" is an accurate description?
Yet their lie still remains.
From your second link Serfati states “For example, since the pelvic girdle is not preserved, there is no direct evidence in Ambulocetus for a connection between the hind limbs and the axial skeleton. This hinders interpretations of locomotion in this animal, since many of the muscles that support and move the hindlimb originate on the pelvis”
And Jonathan Sarfati's lie is still there.
One would think that 10 years is more than enough time to correct a honest mistake! Unless of course, one had no intention of being honest ...