[[And even more websites, (such as AIG) that are full of shi+. ]
Pretty bold statement- problem is your accusation lacks any relevent substance- How bout filling us all in on all the “shi+” on those sites instead of giving vague petty opinions? Nah- that’d be too much actual work to go through and try to refute the science presented on those sites- huh? Easy just to malign and attack their character without backing up your statements.
Answers in Genesis repeats the blue-green algae lie
AiG lies about Ambulocetus pelvis
AiG lies about Chicken & Human Lysozyme
ICR lies about Archaeoraptor
ICR Paluxy "man-tracks" article by John Morris Morris and Duane Gish have since distanced themselves from "Dr." Carl Baugh
Duane Gish claims Peking Man (H. erectus) was a "Giant ape" Gish accepts "Turkana Boy" as a human yet he rejects "Peking Man", even though the skull case is larger?
And hundreds more here.
CottShop, you don't have to lie all that often before you get a reputation as a liar.
Twice should do it for most people ...