Replies

[[Ring species do not, as you point out, show “where the species came from beforehand or what will happen with it” — but the example of ring species I provided was not intended to show that. It was intended only to show how incorrect are the religious beliefs that there are no transitionals and that speciation is impossible.]]

You clealy misunderstand biology- Ring species absolutely do show where they come from and where they will go biologically- They can ONLY go within the parameters of their own KINDS- somethign you fail to understand apparently- looking at htem biologically, it is easy to see where they can go within the parameters of species KINDS- You also fail to understand that ring species clealry are NOT transitions between dissimilar KINDS, but are ONLY transitions WITHIN their own KINDS- fully within the parameters of MICROEvolution, and it is NOT somethign ‘religious’ peopel reject as you falsely claim!

[[But I fully expect that no amount of evidence will convince creationists of this. They are fully committed, for religious reasons,]]

LOL- We’re fully committed to scientific reason- what we’re NOT committed to however is the silly religious dogma that species evolved from one another through common descent when htere is absolutely ZERO evidence to support that mistaken ASSUMPTION/(religious belief)

[[Ring species are an example of speciation, or macroevolution as creationists are fond of calling it.]]

Bzzzt! Get back to us when you understand the difference between MICROEvoltuion and MACROEvolution