Replies

” Ahhh, but as soon as I spot the smoke or fire, I will be over to take your food.

So no fires. “

I’m enough of a realist to understand that, if things come to the state where any of this becomes necessary, my odds of survival are, at best, poor.

The best I will be able to do is to give myself the best chance to beat the odds, being fully aware that I can’t know and have detailed planning for every eventuality — it’s going to be mostly luck that determines my fate.

It’s better to be a mouse than to be a lion, in this situation — I will try very hard to get away from the crowds, and then to keep an extremely low profile... And to fight only when absolutely necessary....

Having said that, I know that, within limits, there is strength in numbers, and I’m more likely to combine resources and cooperate with those I encounter, rather than fight for dominance.

Having said that, I know that, within limits, there is strength in numbers, and I’m more likely to combine resources and cooperate with those I encounter, rather than fight for dominance.<<<

Wise thinking, can’t argue with that.

The simple fact is, there is not a perfect answer to survival, one does what is needed to survive, be it stealing your food for my family or killing me for my food.

It is not the experienced woodsmen like you that worry me.

It is the fool that thinks like the clintons and etc, they will be the real danger, as they will not be prepared, after all this is all the fault of President Bush and they do not even listen to Dr. Bill when he warns them of what will happen, if an attack comes.

On the terror thread, I just posted a link for the new tests that N. Korea did last night.

and will have more on there later.

But the left will tell you there is no war, we do not need to know who is spying on us, etc.

They are the danger to you and I, if they are in the area.