Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Abathar
Yep, it truly was a conservative show, I can't believe that the sci-fi channel hasn't tried to pick it up either.

The Sci-Fi Channel did run it for a while. There just weren't enough produced episodes to keep it running for very long.

Shame about the movie, though. A betrayal of everything the show stood for, and a very un-worthy sendoff.

177 posted on 02/19/2008 12:34:04 PM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]


To: highball
Shame about the movie, though. A betrayal of everything the show stood for, and a very un-worthy sendoff.

I couldn't disagree with you more. The characters were consistent, the loose ends tied up, and the story arc brought to a conclusion. And knowing the work of Joss Whedon, it was the conclusion he had in mind before the series even began; he just had to bring it home faster than he wanted to.

Whedon had to make some compromises to make the movie accessible to folks who hadn't seen the series. I saw Serenity first, and I loved it; Then caught up on Firefly, and I could see how what happened to River Tam, how the Reavers came to be, and some of the other revelations would have been much more of a big payoff if I'd seen the series first.

I'd like to know what you think of as a "betrayal." Especially in light of the fact that the creator of the series was the writer and director of the movie.

200 posted on 02/19/2008 12:57:22 PM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson