Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale
What’s to discuss after rejecting that?

Rejecting what, the tourism thing? Insignificant IMHO and only peripherally related to the discussion in any case.

For one engaged in the scientific pursuits, you sure know how to dance.

45 posted on 02/17/2008 4:12:48 PM PST by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: ForGod'sSake

In case the analogy was overlooked, the appeal to Google is similar to the appeal to the scientific establishment and is a form of fallacy—the appeal to authority—, in this case a negative result meaning the data or facts are not found in the authority. The alternative explanation of the red shift is not needed and does not explain anything the mainstream explanation overlooks. Van Flandern actually has his creds and fellow PhDs are required to at least pretend to listen to him or were until he retired to pursue his own crackpot schemata.


46 posted on 02/17/2008 4:20:49 PM PST by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson