Ah, yes the old “I didn’t like what you said, so I just tweaked it a little” trick. I didn’t say that the printers were being given away for free, I said they were based on the same business model: make the original readily accessible and gouge up on the “refills”. Read my post, word for word, without your GE-colored glasses on and you even see that I was careful NOT to say that the printers weren’t being given away for free (just really cheap). Or else, what in the heck is this phrase doing there “The only difference is precisely how little the razors are “given away” for.” ?
I’m not the one playing tricks of course, I’ve once again simply exposed free software advocates claiming false analogies exist in their attempt to defend “copyleftist” theories. Neither razors or printers are given away for free, by anyone, and any attempted claims they are remain completely false.