That's quite an article. I actually read most of it. Compelling arguments against plate tectonic mechanisms as we have come to, or been led to, believe them.
I suppose I've almost reached the conclusion that any, ANY evidence supporting slow, gradual change; the uniformitarian theory, is the only set of "facts" to be peddled to the unwashed. Arguments to the contrary are spoken of as heresy by the "scientific community". Frustrating.
Neil Adams 'Bad Astronomy' Forum. LINK.
I like what he says -
I was a good researcher . I wouldn't lose my job. I had no tenure to protect. I'm not interested in public debate. And I'm not afraid of being embarassed , which would likely happen . So , without contacting anyone , I simply dug in. Took 40 years. Heh . So , I know I'm not going to convince anyone overnight , especially folks entrenched with the standard model. Oh , no! I come here knowing I 'll not convince anyone, really . I'm merely planting seeds. All I ask is Please watch the videos first, then , if you can be gentlemen then please do. If you are rude , I simply won't respond. Neal Adams
Your comment - Arguments to the contrary are spoken of as heresy by the "scientific community". Frustrating.
The culprit? Peer Review. I think of it as the science mafia.