1 posted on
12/17/2007 10:24:47 AM PST by
ShadowAce
To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...
2 posted on
12/17/2007 10:25:03 AM PST by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
Dear Intel,
Please get rid of the ridiculous “feature” where the standard’s bandwidth is divided by the number of ports. When I hook up an external hard drive and a wireless mouse dongle, I don’t want the hard drive going half-speed because of a friggin’ mouse.
Signed, me.
3 posted on
12/17/2007 10:31:08 AM PST by
Terpfen
(It's your fault, not Pelosi's.)
To: ShadowAce
"(USB is master/slave), "
uh-oh....
4 posted on
12/17/2007 10:41:15 AM PST by
stylin19a
To: ShadowAce
Intel has stated that it expects USB 3.0 to be 10 times as fast as USB 2.0, which would give it a 4.8Gbps transfer rate. In contrast, the current iteration of S3200 will top out at 3.2Gbps. Given that Firewire 400 gives more throughput than USB 480, some 15-70% faster (depending on the test), I'm betting the performance between the two will be close. Then the question is what the other advantages are. USB has only one serious advantage -- it's less expensive.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson