[valkyry1]

I would rather personally research each quote and its history myself, but I hardly have time for that right now, nor do you I think.

Bu I have found so much miss-characterization, and outright distortion coming out the propaganda site sourced in your link or talkorigns, to give it much credence other than as a place for atheists assure themselves that their crusade is science.

[bezelbub]

I would rather personally research each quote and its history myself, but I hardly have time for that right now, nor do you I think.

Trust, but verify! You can't rely on this site only because it pleases you...

Bu I have found so much miss-characterization, and outright distortion coming out the propaganda site sourced in your link or talkorigns, to give it much credence other than as a place for atheists assure themselves that their crusade is science.

Were the names distorted in your post? Or weren't they? So, up to now, the site your quotes come from are those with "miss-characterization, and outright distortion".

[bezelbub]

Bu I have found so much miss-characterization, and outright distortion coming out the propaganda site sourced in your link or talkorigns, to give it much credence other than as a place for atheists assure themselves that their crusade is science.

I'd like you to show some of the "miss-characterization, and outright distortion coming out the propaganda site sourced in your link". Up to now, the only examples of distortions are from the site you cited, i.e., fishy quotations...

[bezelbub]

I would rather personally research each quote and its history myself, but I hardly have time for that right now, nor do you I think.

Merry Christmas -
perhaps, after the holidays, you'll find some time to answer my questions from #95 and #119.