Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ontap
Not so, I can watch an airplane fly and I can drop a rock and see the results of gravity but I cannot make a rock come to life.

But the explanations for why the airplane flies or why the rock falls are scientific theories, just like the explanation on how we came to be. But if you rely on your eyes for everything then do you doubt the existence of an atom or the concept of something traveling faster than the speed of ight? Do you dismiss physics or asronomy since much of that is based on theory as well?

86 posted on 12/13/2007 3:46:22 PM PST by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

I dismiss nothing, including the theory of evolution, I just recognize it for what it is , a theory, not a fact. Any honest person will admit it is a rather flawed theory at that in that non of the major tenets of it have been proven, yet. I do believe though that you are dismissive of creationism even though you know if something inanimate gains life it is more than likely there was an intelligence involved; it is simply more feasible.


87 posted on 12/13/2007 3:55:51 PM PST by ontap (Just another backstabbing conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson