Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Satirical Monsters More Competition for Darwin
The Ledger ^ | December 11, 2007 | John Chambliss

Posted on 12/13/2007 12:45:57 PM PST by SubGeniusX

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121 next last
To: LiteKeeper
The biggest issue for me is how evolution explains the increase in information...and how various systems within living organisms get wired together. It is far too simplistic - talk about leaps of faith!

No faith needed; the process is demonstrated mathematically in this online lecture: Making Genetic Networks Operate Robustly: Unintelligent Non-design Suffices, by Professor Garrett Odell.

61 posted on 12/13/2007 1:51:16 PM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
But we need more of them to stop Global warming ...


62 posted on 12/13/2007 1:51:34 PM PST by SubGeniusX (The People have Unenumerated Rights, The Government does not have Unenumerated Powers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: valkyry1
I found these quotes on several sites with a quick google

You mean you found these quotes on one site with a quick google, then cut and pasted the page. That website is www.creator-creation.com/evolution.htm, which also claims the Earth to be only 5,000 years old.
63 posted on 12/13/2007 1:54:00 PM PST by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Shryke
"as soon as the DI or any other ID organization publishes some research, you ping me. And no, I don't mean anything "disproving evolution". I mean anything proving a designer (other than the Flying Spaghetti Monster). Thanks."

I present to you the single cell. Chocked full of evidence of ID. There are loads of scientific journals exploring it's complex design. (note: they don't call it a complex evolution)

64 posted on 12/13/2007 1:56:29 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII

Yes but these cases I have found that when I have went and dug deeper, that the men did say what they are quoted.

Take it or leave it I guess as you will.


65 posted on 12/13/2007 1:59:50 PM PST by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: SubGeniusX

You might be on to something there. Take it to Al Gore and see if he’ll give you a grant and help you make a docufilm.


66 posted on 12/13/2007 2:00:37 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ontap

Give it your best shot.


67 posted on 12/13/2007 2:03:17 PM PST by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
You do realize that, being the evolutionist that you are, by default, Al Gore is your GOD.
68 posted on 12/13/2007 2:03:55 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

Your research, please? The loads of scientific journals you are discussing just happen to all support evolutionary theory. The prescence of the word “design” does not mean there is a single “designer”.


69 posted on 12/13/2007 2:04:07 PM PST by Shryke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: valkyry1
There is nothing to show that man was in any way connected with monkeys…

That's one of the most ridiculous statements I've seen in a while and is easily disproved. There is only a 1.5% difference in the DNA of a human and a Chimpanzee.


Long Live the Flying Spaghetti Monster!

70 posted on 12/13/2007 2:04:58 PM PST by BubbaBasher (WWW.TWFRED08.COM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
You do realize that, being the evolutionist that you are, by default, Al Gore is your GOD.

You do realize that you are delusional, don't you?

71 posted on 12/13/2007 2:05:04 PM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: SubGeniusX

I think it is hilarious how hopelessly stupid and bigoted the whole spaghetti monster meme makes skeptics appear.

I say keep it coming.

It is hilarious.


72 posted on 12/13/2007 2:09:11 PM PST by lonestar67 (Its time to withdraw from the War on Bush-- your side is hopelessly lost in a quagmire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
"You do realize that you are delusional, don't you?"

Nope, not at all. I do believe you are however, as well as your Gore god, who draws heavily on wrongheaded evolutionary theory in his noble peace prize winning film.

73 posted on 12/13/2007 2:12:32 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: lonestar67
This just in ...

Ron Paul Receives Endorsement from Flying Spaghetti Monster!


74 posted on 12/13/2007 2:17:07 PM PST by BubbaBasher (WWW.TWFRED08.COM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
You do realize that you are delusional, don't you?"

Nope, not at all. I do believe you are however, as well as your Gore god, who draws heavily on wrongheaded evolutionary theory in his noble peace prize winning film.

If you can't come up with anything but insults and delusional comments post to someone else.

75 posted on 12/13/2007 2:19:14 PM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: -=SoylentSquirrel=-

“I always thought that it was meant to specifically mock people who had a belief in God....”

The vast majority are atheists, yes...


76 posted on 12/13/2007 2:20:24 PM PST by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
Nope, not at all. I do believe you are however, as well as your Gore god, who draws heavily on wrongheaded evolutionary theory in his noble peace prize winning film.

AHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHA, ok, ...breathing.....wow. You are one funny, funny dude. That is an amazing bit of logic you've strung together.

77 posted on 12/13/2007 2:27:22 PM PST by Shryke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: All
1 Corinthians 1:18-25 :

For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. For it is written:

"I will destroy the wisdom of the wise; the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate."

Where is the wise man? Where is the scholar? Where is the philosopher of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not know him, God was pleased through the foolishness of what was preached to save those who believe.

Jews demand miraculous signs and Greeks look for wisdom, but we preach Christ crucified: a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles, but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. For the foolishness of God is wiser than man's wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than man's strength.

78 posted on 12/13/2007 2:33:37 PM PST by marinamuffy ("..pacifism ensures that cruelty will prevail on earth." - Dennis Prager/ www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marinamuffy

Amazing how we are using technology to discuss how God destroys it.


79 posted on 12/13/2007 2:40:33 PM PST by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

Here’s one I believe you might find more to your liking, I think that it would behoove you to check out “The Origin of the Species” and read it Darwin clearly states this. It is rather difficult to find on the net because the sites supportive of evolution run scared from defending what is the fact of their argument relating to the origin of life that is to hard to explain , just as you are doing. It is part of the Theory of Evolution.

http://www.vision.net.au/~apaterson/science/darwin_critique1.htm#DARWIN’S%20THEORY


80 posted on 12/13/2007 3:24:33 PM PST by ontap (Just another backstabbing conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson