Posted on 11/08/2007 8:51:31 AM PST by ksen
There have been 27 republican primary polls taken this calendar year WITHOUT referencing Ron Paul. And only 5 polls with Ron Paul.
(Excerpt) Read more at usaelectionpolls.com ...
Save it, looks like your boy was a retread and has been summarily zotted.
He has Constitutional litmus test on every vote...even the ones that are unpopular.
He is consistant. His explanations for his votes are a lesson in Constitutionality.
Anyone else notice that the Ron Paul divide falls about the year 2000?
I’ve been noticing that most of the Ron Paul supporters have been here since before 2000 and most of the Ron Paul detractors have been here since after 2000.
Odd.
Not mine. But I agree with it.
Maybe most of the Ron Paul supporters that have survived are the ones from before 2000, the ones after have felt the heavy hand of Zot?
Vows? Oh my lord.
Funny how even a retread could see clearly on Prawn.
That could be. I forgot about the heavy hand of ZOT.
I just thought it was kind of wierd.
You know Ron was warning about a sea change in the traditional conservative GOP as early as 2003. I’ve been watching with disgust the rise of it to take over the Party since then.
Ron Paul’s warning...
http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2003/cr071003.htm
Is vow too strong a word for you?
My lord blessed me with the ability to not sit idol while those around me ask me to commit suicide with them.
ANYTIME you see a poll with his name on it you can confidently disregard his outcome because the Paulistas spam every one of them.****
RP has just shown that he has 37,000 supporters on the internet that are willing to donate to his campaign. Usually, only a small percentage of supporters are willing to donate money to a candidate. He has more Meet Up groups than all the other Republican candidates put together, so why shouldn’t he get more votes than all the other candidates put together in internet polls?
It is the same thing with the early tv debates. Mostly, only active political people watch these early debates; and, of course, they are going to vote for the candidate that they tuned in to watch.
Not like the Fed Chairman is, for sure:
Ron Paul Schools Ben Bernanke Again
"Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!"- Jim Robinson, Sept, 30, 2007
I think Jim has been an FR member for quite some time...
This is the guy that Paultards champion around here on Freerepublic?
Thanks for posting that link, it further validates what a raving lunatic that is Ron Paul and his Quixotic quest to ruin America, via POTUS.
How much you wanna bet that Suicide Monkey Freepers (pro Prawn) with pre-2000 accounts are out numbered by normal Freepers with pre-2000 accounts?
MSNBC probably had an audience in the hundreds of thousands for Bernanke's appearance this morning.
The YouTube video I linked to, posted sometime after that, already has over 3,000 views and could break 10,000 by tomorrow.
What can be drawn from those numbers? Opinion polls, as traditionally conducted - whether or not they include candidates out of favor with the MSM - are no longer the influential agents of the media they once were. The Internet is where it's at, and will change politics forever.
Will the euphoria of grand military victories—against non-enemies—ever be mellowed?
Neoconservatives are obviously in positions of influence and are well-placed throughout our government and the media. An apathetic Congress put up little resistance and abdicated its responsibilities over foreign affairs. The electorate was easily influenced to join in the patriotic fervor supporting the military adventurism advocated by the neoconservatives.
Neo-conservatism has been around for decades and, strangely, has connections to past generations as far back as Machiavelli. Modern-day neo-conservatism was introduced to us in the 1960s. It entails both a detailed strategy as well as a philosophy of government. The ideas of Teddy Roosevelt, and certainly Woodrow Wilson, were quite similar to many of the views of present-day neocons. Neocon spokesman Max Boot brags that what he advocates is “hard Wilsonianism.” In many ways, there’s nothing “neo” about their views, and certainly nothing conservative. Yet they have been able to co-opt the conservative movement by advertising themselves as a new or modern form of conservatism.
The money and views of Rupert Murdoch also played a key role in promoting the neocon views, as well as rallying support by the general population, through his News Corporation, which owns Fox News Network, the New York Post, and Weekly Standard. This powerful and influential media empire did more to galvanize public support for the Iraqi invasion than one might imagine. This facilitated the Rumsfeld/Cheney policy as their plans to attack Iraq came to fruition. It would have been difficult for the neocons to usurp foreign policy from the restraints of Colin Powell’s State Department without the successful agitation of the Rupert Murdoch empire.
We could play a game with this speech, who said it, Ron Paul, Alex Jones, or Cindy Sheehan.
In regards to dealing with strangers on an Internet message board? Yes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.