Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sionnsar

Sounds likes shades of Eskimo’s descriptions of snow... Plagiarism? ;-)


2,272 posted on 12/21/2007 5:50:58 PM PST by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2270 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse
Not really. You do hear many terms here.

I have yet to compile a "definitive" list.

2,273 posted on 12/21/2007 6:09:49 PM PST by sionnsar (trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2272 | View Replies ]

To: Dead Corpse
I've been doing some reading about one of my pet projects.

They call it "Launch to Space with an Electromagnetic Railgun". I call it a nice first step.

In the document, concern is expressed about safety downrange, noise, durability of the "launch tube", and other matters.

I can help them out. As you may recall, I want to build such a facility in Antarctica. No problems downrange, no complaints about noise. Plenty of room to spread out the launch facility.

We could probably take advantage of the current equivalent of Pikrete, or Pykrete. Maybe reinforced with carbon fiber and other essentials. This eminently practical construction material could be used not only for portions of the orbital vessel, but also for the launch tube as well.

Imagine a four-pole metal/plasma induction railgun, supplemented with magnetic control coils to help keep the craft centered and steady.

Build the launch tube inside an appropriately positioned stable glacier, with the walls strengthened with our formulated Pykrete, and the control rails embedded in the cylindrical walls. Presto! One freight train launched into orbit!

Each launch would probably use up about a million dollars worth of electricity, so I'm not sure how feasible my plan to irrigate the deserts with suborbital snowball tossing would work. The water might be a little pricey.

Still, it is a way to at least utilize the facility, as opposed to amortizing it. And it does allow one to "ramp up" the engineering on the way to being able to launch massive amounts of mass into orbit for a fraction of the current cost (pun unavoidable).

2,279 posted on 12/21/2007 8:54:32 PM PST by NicknamedBob (I had the solution for everything, but it got out of its container.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2272 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson