Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MoochPooch

I don’t think she was too hard on non-magical folk. If you’ll recall her descriptions of the clothing fashions and mistakes of the magical folk you’ll see she was making fun of them too.

Part of the problem is that aside from the Dursleys, very few muggles got described. In the last book, they were being punished severely, and the narrative seemed to be sympathetic to their plight.

But clearly, it is a story about magic, as is Niven’s. For those who cannot perform magic, it is as if they were handicapped in some way. In fact, the whole point of the conflict erupting in the final book was over the treatment to be accorded to the non-magical.

Why would Rowling be harsh toward non-magical folk? She KNOWS she is among us.


155 posted on 10/20/2007 9:54:06 PM PDT by NicknamedBob ("The enemy of my enemy is an anemone." -- Nemo, and Nemo's father.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: NicknamedBob
Fixed it:

Why would Rowling be harsh toward non-magical folk? She KNOWS she is among us they are the ones buying her books!

160 posted on 10/21/2007 11:03:26 AM PDT by null and void (Franz Kafka would have killed himself in despair if he lived in the world we inhabit today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson