Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SUN68RAY

HA! The *will* STATES???? didn’t we all read that the ‘will’ specifically omitted any future children, known and unknown?

HKS wants us to believe ANS was going to rob Daniel’s trust, invested for him for x-years, to ‘share’ with other children instead of setting up their own trusts with her anticipated future earnings? I’m sure Daniel would have said something about that!

Is HKS saying that, dying intestate, Daniel’s trust would go only to ANS? Wouldn’t it be, 50% to his father and 50% to ANS, as closest blood relatives? then DL would get ANS’s 50%, but Daniel’s father is still alive for his 50%? IMO

HKS had 4 months to advise ANS on a new will - in that time, he advised her on burial plots, Appeals Court appearances, on interviews, on picture/video sales, on supposed trips to dubai, on contracts with Trimspa chocolates and water, on publicity appearances, on legal bills, on autopsies, on ‘purchases’ of homes and boats - and we’re to believe that HKS forgot, to mention a will?????? ANS didn’t want to make a new one out, I’m guessing!

ANS knew what she was doing - DL was precluded on purpose! ANS told more than three! people she thought her life was in danger and she knew LB was coming after custody since April ‘06!!!! IMO MOO IMO

Anxiously awaiting the financials on ‘Daniel’s trust’.....


852 posted on 10/18/2007 10:35:03 PM PDT by blueplum ([IC - ICE -(ice bath)])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 801 | View Replies ]


To: blueplum

Theoretically, if HKS had been doing his job properly, which we know he wasn’t, or let’s just say if Rale had been doing it, there would have already been a dormant Daniel trust established and in place before Daniel died, waiting to be activated - so that *if* he died at such an early age, his own estate would have language referring to it in either his will or any letters testamentary that would have been prepared had he died intestate, which he must have. (We haven’t heard otherwise.)

And *if* that had been done, there would have been a sister for those 3 days, who would have split his share of his mother’s estate.

If that group *believed* they would prevail in Marshall v Marshall, there would have been hell to pay if it had been revealed that he, too, stood to gain several hundred million from his mother. Point being, they should have been prepared for the possibility that he and Anna might have died together in a car or plane crash or some other such tragedy - or even if all three, he and his mom and his sister, passed away in the same event.

With a live-in lawyer and others on constant retainer, this should have been done virtually automatically.


893 posted on 10/19/2007 7:41:38 AM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 852 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson