Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anna Nicole Smith, Seeking Justice #4

Posted on 10/13/2007 6:14:00 PM PDT by fatima

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,361-1,3801,381-1,4001,401-1,420 ... 5,761-5,772 next last
To: Jane Austen

He had a complete unethical - probably illegal - relationship with Anna and that should be reason enough for Virgie to be able to fight him in court.

Of course she could have done that if Brikhead had not hitched himself to Howie.

If HK$ gets away with this - the whole court system needs an investigation.


1,381 posted on 10/22/2007 6:42:08 PM PDT by sodpoodle (Common people have common sense.......... and there are so many of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1380 | View Replies]

To: nature
Nature, I believe the black object below the person in the black bathing suit (or a black top over jeans) is one of Anna’s dogs. I’m not sure the person in black isn’t Anna, because the hair is blonde, but the pictures aren’t clear enough - for me anyway - to say conclusively who it is except, I do believe that’s a dog near the person in black.
1,382 posted on 10/22/2007 6:43:26 PM PDT by PeskyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1325 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle; Jane Austen
If HK$ gets away with this - the whole court system needs an investigation.

I agree with you and Jane wholeheartedly.

1,383 posted on 10/22/2007 6:48:53 PM PDT by PeskyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1381 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

Since his unethical behavior is obvious and public, it should already be looked into. Sometimes it feels as if the media deliberately tries to avoid the story.


1,384 posted on 10/22/2007 6:50:41 PM PDT by Jane Austen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1381 | View Replies]

To: SUN68RAY

” ... The new court papers obtained by CelebTV.com specify Stern is seeking 6% of any money the estate gets from Smith’s late oil-tycoon husband, J. Howard Marshall II’s, estate.

“A contingent fee agreement on file with the Bankruptcy Court and incorporated by this reference pertaining to the Marshall litigation, payment of which is conditioned upon recovery in the Marshall litigation, and the amount will be six percent (6%) of the Estate’s net recovery, if any,” the papers read. ...”

Let’s see here. Trying to figure out compound lies here to arrive at a semblance of truth, lol.

OK, if he is no longer part of the original law firm retained by Ms Marshall, HKS will have to settle with them. If it was always “Law Offices of HKS” who was retained by Ms Marshall, then that’s all his, except for any employees or clerks or investigators or hired help he had who haven’t been paid.

THEN, that should only be up until 1999, when he *claims* he began his *intimate relationship* with Ms Marshall, whether she was aware of it or not. At that point, he was in violation of his ethical guidelines as an officer of the court, so the agreement should have been voided or could be actionable by Ms Marshall if she were alive, or by her current heir(s) - that would be Dannielynn.

THEN, there is the matter of long-standing practice that Ms Marshall had been advised by her so-called attorney not to pay the bills of other attorneys that followed after him - with the possible exception of Rale and maybe Neavitt. Would love to know their past billings to Ms Marshall and payment (or not) of same.

However, since I don’t believe there ever will BE a settlement in the Marshall v Marshall case, it’s all moot. And I’m laughing at this claim.


1,385 posted on 10/22/2007 7:12:41 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1357 | View Replies]

To: Rte66

“””However, since I don’t believe there ever will BE a settlement in the Marshall v Marshall case, it’s all moot. And I’m laughing at this claim.””””

That would depend on the Judge assigned to the case..
can you spell *Seidlin* ?

I do so want to believe you;)


1,386 posted on 10/22/2007 7:22:57 PM PDT by sodpoodle (Common people have common sense.......... and there are so many of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1385 | View Replies]

To: Rte66

http://entertainment.msn.com/celebs/article.aspx?news=280658&affid=100055

http://www.miamiherald.com/776/story/280785.html

I am with you on that. There will never be any Marshall money going to him. He must think he is someone very special.


1,387 posted on 10/22/2007 7:29:53 PM PDT by SUN68RAY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1385 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Larry didn’t go to Horizons on that trip - unless maybe a silent drive-by, which I’m sure he probably did. Just like the time he was in Myrtle the same time she was and he didn’t call her.

Now I’m starting to think Howard had a phone tap on Anna the whole time in CA. That’s the only way he - and now Larry, too - can claim knowing so definitively every single person Anna did or didn’t talk to during that time.

The fact that she continued texting and emailing Larry all during the pregnancy, while publicly fighting him, and Larry sent presents for Dannielynn for Christmas and maybe other occasions, tells me HKS did NOT know that was going on - or couldn’t tap her phone in The Bahamas - or was possibly in on it, with Larry, but without Anna knowing.

I’m certain HKS had a keystroke monitor on her computer, if he even needed one - which he probably didn’t - he probably just checked it every day or every few hours to know every moment of her life. I get suffocating feelings just imagining all this.


1,388 posted on 10/22/2007 7:33:28 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1375 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

It’s not a Seidlin. He couldn’t begin to follow the ins and outs of Marshall v Marshall. It was kicked back from SCOTUS, you know - so the 9th Circus judge has to be the most top notch they have.

I know, I know, it’s SF - but still, the case is so long-lived that most either won’t want to touch it or only the most learned will demonstrate any competency in tackling it. Personally, I don’t think the kick-back will have any legs.


1,389 posted on 10/22/2007 7:38:05 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1386 | View Replies]

To: SUN68RAY

I can just hear his convo with Kent Richland now, on the eve of any next hearing (which I don’t think there will be, except for maybe a dismissal).

*Dammit, KR, I carried her purse! I carried the dogs! In fact, my parents are paying for dog-sitters for her lousy mutts right now, as we speak! I almost changed a diaper for her baby one time! I heated a bottle for her once! I’ve doled out paychecks to all the nannies and housekeepers for Anna!

I flicked all the syringes she needed for the shots that kept her alive! I didn’t laugh at her when she fell down or had seizures! I took pictures, to preserve her legacy! Ya gotta think of me when that wad of money comes in! Ya gotta! Please? Pretty please?*


1,390 posted on 10/22/2007 7:46:08 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1387 | View Replies]

To: Rte66

“”I get suffocating feelings just imagining all this.””

Watching a crime show today - about some illegal immigrants who became *slaves* to 2 guys who tortured and restrained them. These were healthy guys - why didn’t they escape?

Then I thought of Anna - totally drugged into addiction - 8 months pregnant - no transportation - locked doors - blocked & monitored phones and emails - she may not even had access to a phone without the creep dialling the number. No food - non-English speaking hired help. The only people she socialized with were in the creep’s pocket and I am confident she was never with other people unless the creep sat right by her side - with the drink and a straw. It is frightening - it frightened Daniel.


1,391 posted on 10/22/2007 7:47:47 PM PDT by sodpoodle (Common people have common sense.......... and there are so many of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1388 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle; SUN68RAY
This is HUGE - this blows a complete hole in our theory - that he was just in in for the money.

No, your theory is on target. Think back to Larry King show with Lin Wood. Then, the warrants the next day (or the next) and HK$ was at KE's, retrieving the dogs, he said.

He's running scared IMHO. Too many of his comments are "caring for ANS and Dannielynn, Daniel" He's using the child again to make himself look better.

Was, or was LB not, at home? Was he in Hawaii, or not? If he was gone, I find that a little suspicious.

1,392 posted on 10/22/2007 7:47:54 PM PDT by lakey (Duncan Hunter '08 for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1379 | View Replies]

To: Rte66

ah, but how do we know it was anna, who was texting larry? seidlin showed a moment of brilliance when he got howie to admit he had her passwords...jmo...I wish we had more so we could compare ‘styles’ etc. for consistency

from anna, we know that larry was a stalker - in fact, everyone at the tiki was witness to that, lol. Can you imagine in real life your ex-boyfriend showing up to your date with a ‘i love my girlfriend’ t-shirt on? Looking for a fight, I’d say.....stuck on stupid, kinda act....and i don’t buy his story that he just happened to decide to visit friends in MB out of the blue - photogs have telephotos and anna was beachfront, if you catch my drift ;) (do we know where the pic of anna, and anna w/hks topless on condo deck ever came from???) - from what I’ve ever heard, once a stalker, always a stalker...deep, deep seated problems there....imo moo

I’ll look back in my ‘udder’ notes to see if I have the complete interview - sorry, I didn’t check the link before I posted - would be a shame if it was pulled


1,393 posted on 10/22/2007 7:47:55 PM PDT by blueplum ([IC - ICE -(ice bath)])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1388 | View Replies]

To: sodpoodle

January 22, their *shared* birthday. Sometime earlier in the day than when Virgie went, because she found the note.


1,394 posted on 10/22/2007 7:49:28 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1358 | View Replies]

To: SUN68RAY; sodpoodle; Rte66

This assistant professor of law in Arlington, VA doesn’t think there will be any money either. I’d like to know what makes Howard think he’s entitled to another family’s money. Anna got what J. Howard Marshall wanted her to have and I think he was plenty generous. DL is going to end up with so many legal bills, all thanks to HKS.

Long article but interesting. This was before Larry was named the father.

http://www.law.com/traffic/AnnaNicole.html


1,395 posted on 10/22/2007 7:54:17 PM PDT by DorisCCC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1387 | View Replies]

To: lakey

He was home. Two different TV shows talked to him - one through the intercom and then Access Hollywood out in front a little later.


1,396 posted on 10/22/2007 8:09:27 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1392 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

My guess anytime the paps were where ANS was and were snapping her, is that HKS was the one who called them.


1,397 posted on 10/22/2007 8:11:54 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1393 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Oh, I do think Anna was texting Larry at first and hiding it from HKS (if that was actually possible). But, I’m sure there was a showdown about it at some point.

Maybe she “lost” the battle and HKS insisted on the “Mommie Dearest” ET video as his “winnin’s.”


1,398 posted on 10/22/2007 8:16:32 PM PDT by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1393 | View Replies]

To: DorisCCC

The Supreme Court last year ruled that the 9th Circuit’s interpretation that the federal courts have no jurisdiction whatsoever over probate matters was overly broad, and the justices have sent the case back to the 9th Circuit on remand. Now the 9th Circuit will focus on the specific arguments of this legal dispute.
This is bad news for Dannielynn and Smith’s legal team. The remaining legal issues surrounding this litigation are fairly straightforward and uncomplicated. J. Howard Marshall was legally allowed to direct his bequest to whomever he pleased, and he chose his son Pierce. He never intended to leave any portion of his estate to Smith or her heirs. We know these things because that’s what the jury found after a six-month trial in Texas. We also know that, under the doctrine of res judicata, each of these findings must be upheld in any other courts that look at this case.

At this point, of course, the tragic center of this saga is not Smith, but Dannielynn. One fears, at worst, that this child may be being used as leverage to support the ongoing claims of Smith’s lawyers and a number of hangers-on who seek to get rich quick.

You know this is what is so sad. Dannielynn is nothing but a pawn to the lawyers and Larry and Howard.


1,399 posted on 10/22/2007 8:16:42 PM PDT by SUN68RAY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1395 | View Replies]

To: Rte66

o.k. But, I don’t want sod and others wandering off, believing they were on the wrong track. They had it right to begin with. HK$ has always been after the money. Now, he just wants to stay out of jail.


1,400 posted on 10/22/2007 8:17:55 PM PDT by lakey (Duncan Hunter '08 for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1396 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,361-1,3801,381-1,4001,401-1,420 ... 5,761-5,772 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson