[[If you have real science, you can get it published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.]]
Yes GGG- You know- that ‘real science’ like the science that ignores biological impossibilities, that ‘real science’ that claims entropy isn’t a problem for macroevolution when it most certainly is a problem for absolutely every other living and non living thing on this planet, that ‘real science’ that is based on by guess by gosh assumptions abotu past events and ignores the fact that the very energy needed to ‘create’ the impossible would have destroyed life right from ther very start and at every point along the way. That ‘real science’ that gets published in peer reviews- not the ‘psuedo-sciecne that points out the serious insurmountable biologically impossible problems with the ‘real science’- Don’t ya know nuttin? Sheeesh!!! Oh- and there’s absolutely NO bias in the peer review system- nope- no sirreee- none what so ever (provided that those hwo present material that is nothign but proevolution sign the “I beleive in naturalistic miracles and a naturalistic god that directed those miracles, and denouince anyone who dissagrees with me’ statement of faith) No bias whatsoever- why it’s the friendliest most open arms cult- errr- review process aroiund- and anyone that doesn’t have hteir owrk published in proevo only publications isn’t a ‘true scientist’ Gosh- I thought everyone knew that?
LOL...And in keeping with Darwinian impossibilities, I dub you the serious comedian. Well done!