[ConservativeMind]

I appreciate the attempt to use the Bible to explain such things, but it really seems hokey when, at the beginning of the report, the author states that because no one has come up with a scientific reason, that this automatically means it proves Creationism.

That is not a rational argument.

Just because no one has told me why my car is slowly leaking oil doesn’t mean fairies are tapping the bottom of it with spoons made from dandelions while nursing ants.

His argument makes about as much sense as that.

[GodGunsGuts]

See post 6 and post 12 for summary and technical paper. I have read his book, and I really think he’s on to something. You be the judge—GG