Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sources: Goodell determines Pats broke rules by taping Jets' signals
ESPN ^ | 9-11-2007 | Chris Mortensen

Posted on 09/11/2007 4:12:17 PM PDT by jmc813

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-138 next last
To: Bronzewound

Thank you.


61 posted on 09/11/2007 5:49:16 PM PDT by ops33 (Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: lepton

Thank you.


62 posted on 09/11/2007 5:50:00 PM PDT by ops33 (Retired USAF Senior Master Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Really, what is to stop any team from placing someone in the stands behind the opponent's bench and just calling in the signals? How could the NFL possibly police this?

I am a huge Pats fan and will be VERY disappointed if this is true though. They knew the rules and if they flagrantly flouted them they should pay a high price.

63 posted on 09/11/2007 5:50:17 PM PDT by Dems_R_Losers (Remember the Pentagon - - www.pentagonmemorial.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Bronzewound
No one has mentioned the irregularities in the number of frequencies the Pats were using (something they themselves were unable to explain away).

I think what it points to is the idea that if they have been resorting to these kinds of tactics previously to gain unfair advantages, it would certainly call into question their perceived superiority. That could render moot, the notion that the Patriots don't need this kind of thing to defeat the Jets or anyone else. Any thoughts?

64 posted on 09/11/2007 5:50:39 PM PDT by Bronzewound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers
What's particularly unusual about this is that this is the kind of situation where the HOME team would typically have a better opportunity to do something like this.

Ironically, the NFL is forced to deal with a situation like this because it is almost a "natural" consequence of what I consider the biggest flaw in the game of football -- the fact that NOTHING HAPPENS during the vast majority of a football game (thereby enabling the games to be over-coached to the point where the players themselves are almost extraneous).

65 posted on 09/11/2007 5:54:10 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Well I'm a Patriots fan but I think the team should be punished. Forfeit the Jets game and get a 50 point handicap for every game for the rest of the season. Also, I think Bill Belichick should get a public flogging and be put in the stocks. Furthermore, Tom Brady shall have both his knees broken and one of his arms smashed with a sledgehammer with Randy Moss having both his legs amputated.

This should level the playing field...somewhat.

66 posted on 09/11/2007 5:57:59 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (I am 76 days away from outliving Freddie Mercury)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers
Really, what is to stop any team from placing someone in the stands behind the opponent's bench and just calling in the signals? How could the NFL possibly police this?

I was thinking the exact same thing earlier. I pacified myself for the moment by reckoning that having to verbally relay the signal by phone might be just enough too slow for it to be effective. If a camera signal were instantaneously seen in the coaching booth that would be tantamount to seeing them live and thus give enough time to react.

I cannot identify myself as a Pats fan, but have much admired them in recent years, for the idea of acheiving excellence by team play. Like you, I would be very disappointed to learn that they have done it otherwise.

67 posted on 09/11/2007 5:58:17 PM PDT by Bronzewound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Bronzewound
If a camera signal were instantaneously seen in the coaching booth that would be tantamount to seeing them live and thus give enough time to react.

Instant view is obviously not the issue, as they are allowed to have binoculars. It seems to me that any advantage would be in being able to rewind, and in examining a full sequence of signals, repeatedly.

68 posted on 09/11/2007 6:02:52 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I am 76 days away from outliving Freddie Mercury

CTM (chuckling to myself)

69 posted on 09/11/2007 6:05:31 PM PDT by Bronzewound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I am 76 days away from outliving Freddie Mercury

CTM (chuckling to myself)

70 posted on 09/11/2007 6:05:42 PM PDT by Bronzewound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

Wasn’t there an incident last year in which the Jets were accused of cheating in some way against the Pats? Can someone refresh my memory?


71 posted on 09/11/2007 6:06:23 PM PDT by adeodatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Bronzewound

Two things strike me as discordant in this...if the fuss is about anything more than being open about violating a rule...are that we a) have people coming forward suggesting that the Patriots have been doing this repeatedly, and b) that they haven’t taken the simple steps to make it untenable, such as simple variants of the method that Parcells suggests.


72 posted on 09/11/2007 6:06:33 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

I’m a Colts fan and it’s true Bellichek is a cut every corner, it’s only cheating if you get caught, push every rule, SOB. He’s also the best head coach in the history of the league. He’s gotten more out of less than anyone. It’s all part of the same competitive package. I’ll be glad when that guy retires.


73 posted on 09/11/2007 6:08:58 PM PDT by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lepton
Instant view is obviously not the issue, as they are allowed to have binoculars. It seems to me that any advantage would be in being able to rewind, and in examining a full sequence of signals, repeatedly.

I agree that being able to learn from the recorded sequences is likely the primary use for this, but once signals were decoded, don't you think the ability to see the signaling in real time without having to verbally relay it might help as well?

Also, I wasn't aware that binoculars were allowed. Are they allowed in the booth and at field level?

74 posted on 09/11/2007 6:14:36 PM PDT by Bronzewound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

Discussion video on NFL.com:

http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d80243d4b

(Sounds like everyone’s gonna come out of the woodwork with past grievances...)


75 posted on 09/11/2007 6:18:15 PM PDT by LibFreeOrDie (L'Chaim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lepton
and b) that they haven’t taken the simple steps to make it untenable, such as simple variants of the method that Parcells suggests.

I have been overly busy the last week or so, and actually just learned of this whole thing tonight from this thread. What did Parcells have to say about it?

76 posted on 09/11/2007 6:21:19 PM PDT by Bronzewound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Bronzewound

Saw Parcells on ESPN (or somewhere) the other day and he didn’t seem upset by this.He said that the solution is simple....issue your defense numbered arm bands and change the numbering each week.Problem solved...according to Bill.

3 posted on 09/11/2007 3:50:53 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (If martyrdom is so cool,why does Osama Obama go to such great lengths to avoid it?)


77 posted on 09/11/2007 6:22:57 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Bender2
I hope Roger Goodell forces me to marry Bridget Moynahan to give Tom's little bastard a true father he can look up to...

Your off-colored joke is neither warranted nor appreciated. This thread has nothing to do with Brady's family, his personal life, or your own personal feelings of inadequacy.

78 posted on 09/11/2007 6:42:53 PM PDT by azsportsterman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Yep I am so old and have been watching them so long I remember the pre-Meridith quaterback who was so short he had to throw jump passes to clear the line (Eddie?).


79 posted on 09/11/2007 7:00:59 PM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

Anybody else remember when Victor Kiam was owner of the Patriots and he ran the Zamboni out to clear the field of snow for a game-winning field goal? Now that was in your face cheating, but they got away with it as far as I recall.


80 posted on 09/11/2007 7:03:20 PM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson